⭐ 🚨 36 Minutes Ago: Trump Claims Supreme Court Has No Power Over His Military Deployments — America in shock

The Core Claim: “Unreviewable Presidential Power”

According to the administration’s argument, the president’s deployment of federalized National Guard troops is a “non-reviewable, exclusive presidential judgment”, meaning judges cannot block, limit, or even examine the reasons behind it.

In plain terms:

If the president decides to send troops into any U.S. city, the courts cannot stop him.

This position seeks to place domestic military decisions outside the reach of judicial oversight — a move that critics say would fundamentally rewrite the balance of power in American democracy.

—

The Legal Battle: States Push Back Hard

The filing comes amid ongoing legal battles between the Trump administration and several states — including California, Illinois, and Oregon — where judges have questioned whether troop deployments were justified or lawful.

Some courts have already ruled that:

There was no evidence of a rebellion or insurrection,

Local law enforcement was not overwhelmed, and

Military-style deployments blurred the line between policing and warfare.

Trump’s team, however, insists that the president alone decides what qualifies as a threat — and that courts must defer completely to his judgment.

—

What This Means for Supreme Court Power

If accepted, the administration’s argument would effectively strip the Supreme Court of its authority to check presidential military actions inside U.S. borders.

This raises urgent constitutional questions:

Can a president override states and deploy troops at will?

Should courts have no say in whether the military can police American streets?

Where are the limits of executive power?

Legal experts warn that granting unchecked domestic military authority to any president  Republican or Democrat would set a precedent unlike anything seen in U.S. history.

Public Reaction: Shock, Fear, and Outrage

Within minutes of the filing becoming public, social media erupted.

Americans expressed concerns that this argument pushes the country toward:

Unrestrained federal power

Militarized policing

Erosion of state authority

Weakening of the judiciary

Supporters of Trump praised the move as a step toward restoring “control and order,” while opponents called it a dangerous constitutional overreach.

Why This Moment Is So Critical

This fight is not simply about one deployment or one city.

It’s about who holds the ultimate power inside the United States:

The courts?

The states?

Or the president acting alone?

The Supreme Court now faces a defining test:

Will it assert its authority  or will it accept the argument that even the highest court in the land cannot question a president’s military decisions