Connect with us

NEWS

🚨 NOW: Trump Shares White House Situation Room Images During Venezuela Crisis Donald Trump just dropped a bombshell — literally. He posted exclusive images from the White House Situation Room showing his administration in action as events unfolded in Venezuela. The photos give a rare behind-the-scenes glimpse of U.S. decision-making — and raise urgent questions about the legality and timing of the strikes. What was happening in those critical moments? And what do these images really reveal about the operation? 🔥 See the full images and the story everyone is talking about — click here before it disappears.

Published

on

🚨 NOW: Trump Shares White House Situation Room Images During Venezuela Crisis
In a move that has sent shockwaves through Washington, former President Donald Trump has posted a series of rare images from the White House Situation Room, showing his administration in

action as events unfolded in Venezuela.
The photos, shared on social media, offer a behind-the-scenes glimpse of one of the most controversial military operations in recent history. They show officials huddled over documents, monitoring screens, and making split-second decisions — moments that the public rarely sees.

But while the images are striking, they also raise urgent questions: What was happening in those critical moments? Were the actions taken legal? And why were these events not fully disclosed to Congress or the public at the time?
The Context

Reports indicate that U.S. forces began military operations targeting Venezuelan-linked vessels as early as September. Under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, any use of U.S. armed forces in hostilities without congressional approval triggers a 60-day window for authorization. If Congress does not approve, military action must immediately cease.
The revelation of these Situation Room images comes at a time when legal experts are arguing that the military actions may have violated U.S. law, potentially rising to the level of impeachable conduct.

“The War Powers clock started ticking the moment U.S. bombs were deployed,” said Joe Gallina, attorney and publisher of Call to Activism.
“These images show the decision-making in real time, but the law doesn’t reset just because a photo is taken.”
Why These Images Matter
Transparency or Spin?
Trump’s post raises questions about whether the images are meant to demonstrate transparency or to control the narrative.
Legal Implications
The War Powers Resolution exists to prevent presidents from launching military operations without congressional oversight. Sharing images from the Situation Room does not change the legal obligations that may have already been violated.
Public Reaction

Americans are now seeing, in real time, the faces and moments behind major military decisions. Some see it as a rare look at leadership under pressure; others view it as a propaganda tool to shape perception after the fact.
What Comes Next
With Congress largely obstructed and oversight limited, accountability may depend more than ever on public awareness. These images fuel the debate about whether the military actions were justified — or illegal.

⚠️ The full story behind these Situation Room images could change how Americans view the Venezuela operation. Click here to see every photo and uncover the truth.

Up Next

🚨 THE TAKEDOWN: Kamala Harris Just Blew the Whistle on Trump’s “Illegal” Venezuela Move — And It’s NOT About Security Kamala Harris just said what no one else would. This isn’t about protecting America. It’s about oil. In a scorching statement, the former VP accused Trump of replaying America’s most expensive mistake: selling war as “strength” while working families pick up the bill. Harris exposed three alarming red flags: ❌ No legal authority ❌ No accountability ❌ No exit plan While Trump plays strongman on TV, Harris says he’s quietly sidelining real democratic voices and cutting backroom deals — a recipe for chaos, not safety. Her warning is blunt: this is how disasters start — ego over law, headlines over people. 👉 Read what Harris revealed, why legal experts are alarmed, and what this could cost YOU. Click now before this story gets buried.

Don't Miss

🔥 IMPEACHABLE: Trump Secretly Bombed Venezuela for Months — Congress Never Approved ItA legal bombshell is exploding in Washington — and it changes everything. A U.S. legal expert is now laying out why Donald Trump’s military action against Venezuela isn’t just reckless foreign policy, but a clear violation of U.S. law. And one buried fact completely destroys the administration’s defense: The bombing didn’t start recently. It started months ago — in September. That single detail detonates Trump’s legal argument. Here’s why it matters. Under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, the law is crystal clear: If a president sends U.S. forces into hostilities without a formal declaration of war or explicit approval from Congress, the clock starts ticking. The president has 60 days. No approval? The military action must stop. No loopholes. No resets. No excuses. Public reporting confirms that U.S. forces began bombing Venezuelan-linked boats as far back as September, using American military force in the Caribbean. That legally qualifies as hostilities. Congress never declared war. Congress never authorized the strikes. And Congress was never asked to approve them within the 60-day deadline. Which means the legal clock started in September. And it expired months ago. “That’s the part people are missing,” said attorney Joe Gallina, who has training in international and cross-border criminal law. “Once U.S. bombs were used in September, the War Powers Resolution was triggered. Everything after that runs on the same clock — and that clock is long dead.” This is not a gray area. This is not a policy debate. Legal scholars are now saying the quiet part out loud: continuing military operations after the War Powers deadline — without congressional authorization — is unlawful and impeachable. The law was written after Vietnam to stop presidents from doing exactly this.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NEWS10 hours ago

JUST IN: Democrats Call for Donald Trump’s Impeachment, Accusing Him of Being a War Criminal and Launching Illegal Military Strikes in Venezuela and Abducting President Nicolás Maduro Without Congressional Approval

NEWS10 hours ago

NO LONGER A RUMOR: Senate Quietly Launches Impeachment Drive — T.R.U.M.P Faces Sanctions in Coming Days 🇺🇸💥 Overnight, Washington slipped into countdown mode ⏳🏛️. Senate staff cleared schedules, legal teams reviewed precedents, and leadership quietly prepared for what many see as an imminent impeachment push. The machinery is moving — subtle, urgent, and deliberate 🔥👀. Sources say timing, not just politics, is the trigger. Allies hedge, opponents coordinate, and even defenders ask: what happens when the push hits the floor? ⚖️📊 Analysts warn this could move faster than any previous attempt. Full story in comments 👇

NEWS10 hours ago

BREAKING: Democratic Senate Intel Committee Vice Chair SMASHES the emergency glass, warning that Trump’s Venezuela strike risks unleashing global chaos. Sen. Mark Warner just did what too few leaders in Washington are willing to do anymore: he told the truth — loudly — about the dangerous road Donald Trump is dragging America down. In a blistering statement responding to U.S. military action targeting Venezuela, the Senate Intelligence Committee’s vice chairman warned that this isn’t about strength or justice. It’s about shredding the Constitution and lighting a match under the global rulebook. Warner reminded the country that the Constitution gives Congress — not one impulsive president — the authority to decide when America goes to war. “Our Constitution places the gravest decisions about the use of military force in the hands of Congress for a reason. Using military force to enact regime change demands the closest scrutiny, precisely because the consequences do not end with the initial strike,” Warner accurately reminded Americans. The Democratic Senator then pointed out exactly what some of those consequences could be. “If the United States asserts the right to use military force to invade and capture foreign leaders it accuses of criminal conduct, what prevents China from claiming the same authority over Taiwan’s leadership? What stops Vladimir Putin from asserting similar justification to abduct Ukraine’s president? Once this line is crossed, the rules that restrain global chaos begin to collapse, and authoritarian regimes will be the first to exploit it,” Warner warned. Warner’s criticism of Trump’s actions didn’t prevent him from acknowledging the reality of the kidnapped Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro’s history of abuses against his own people. “None of this absolves Maduro. He is a corrupt authoritarian who has repressed his people, stolen elections, imprisoned political opponents, and presided over a humanitarian catastrophe that has forced millions of Venezuelans to flee. The Venezuelan people deserve democratic leadership, and the United States and the international community should have done far more, years ago, to press for a peaceful transition after Maduro lost a vote of his own citizens. But recognizing Maduro’s crimes does not give any president the authority to ignore the Constitution,” the Senate Intel Committee Vice-chair stated. And then Warner dropped the hammer on Trump for his blatant inconsistencies. “The hypocrisy underlying this decision is especially glaring. This same president recently pardoned former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández, who was convicted in a U.S. court on serious drug trafficking charges, including conspiring with narcotics traffickers while in office. Yet now, the administration claims that similar allegations justify the use of military force against another sovereign nation. You cannot credibly argue that drug trafficking charges demand invasion in one case, while issuing a pardon in another,” he said. In other words, you can’t have it both ways. You don’t get to pardon convicted drug traffickers on one hand and launch invasions over drug allegations on the other. That’s not justice. That’s lawless power politics. Warner closed with a warning every American should take seriously: “America’s strength comes from our commitment to the rule of law, democratic norms, and constitutional restraint. When we abandon those principles, even in the name of confronting bad actors, we weaken our credibility, endanger global stability, and invite abuses of power that will long outlast any single presidency.” Trump’s unilateral actions aren’t strength or leadership. They’re simply reckless acts of greed and power-grabbing. And Virginia Senator Mark Warner just put it on the record

NEWS10 hours ago

Congress MOVES Toward Impeachment After Trump HIDES Venezuela Strike Video A Democratic lawmaker is pushing legislation to force the Pentagon to release a specific video from September 2nd—footage of a second U.S. strike on a vessel after the first strike had already disabled it. According to lawmakers who’ve seen it. They hid THIS for a reason…

NEWS11 hours ago

🚨 “NO TRUMP, NO JANUARY 6.” Jack Smith just dropped a bombshell in newly released deposition testimony, saying the Capitol attack would not have happened without Donald Trump. Smith called Trump the most culpable and responsible figure, accusing him of knowingly spreading false election claims, directing allies, and then refusing to act as violence unfolded — all for his own benefit. ⚖️🔥 The implications are massive — and the story is still unfolding… 👇👇

NEWS11 hours ago

🚨🔥 JUST IN — VIRAL FIRESTORM ERUPTS ONLINE: Taylor Swift is being pulled into the Venezuela crisis after posts circulating online claim she privately condemned Donald Trump’s military action and the arrest of President Nicolás Maduro as: “A betrayal of peace, humanity, and the values we should all stand for.” The alleged remarks — spreading rapidly across social media — have set off a political and cultural explosion, with millions demanding to know: 👉 Did the world’s biggest pop star just challenge a U.S. military operation? 👉 Is Trump now facing backlash not just from Congress — but from global culture icons? So far, Swift’s team has not issued an official confirmation, but the silence itself is fueling speculation as hashtags linking her name to Venezuela surge worldwide. Critics say this moment could mark a turning point, where entertainment, politics, and war collide — and where silence is no longer neutral. 🔥 If confirmed, it would be one of the most high-profile celebrity condemnations of U.S. foreign policy in years. 👀 The world is watching. Congress is watching. Fans are watching. ➡️ Click for updates before this disappears.

NEWS12 hours ago

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has confirmed that the Department of Justice is actively investigating alleged government weaponization spanning the Obama and Biden administrations. Bondi says the probe centers on claims of election interference aimed at Donald Trump and his supporters, while Democrats were allegedly shielded from accountability.

NEWS13 hours ago

Trump FACES JAIL as GOP Turns — 50 Republicans Join Democrats to Convict Trump! Kamala Harris Tonight, I want to explain why the number 50 matters so much in this moment. In this hypothetical scenario, the U.S. Senate has crossed a historic line. Conviction requires a two-thirds majority—67 votes—and that threshold could only be reached if a large number of Republicans broke with their own president. Fifty of them did. What changed wasn’t politics…

NEWS13 hours ago

🚨Congress MOVES Toward Impeachment After Trump HIDES Venezuela Strike Video👈 A Democratic lawmaker is pushing legislation to force the Pentagon to release a specific video from September 2nd—footage of a second U.S. strike on a vessel after the first strike had already disabled it. According to lawmakers who’ve seen it, the video shows two survivors on a shipwrecked craft being killed. That matters because under the laws of war, attacking shipwreck survivors is explicitly prohibited. What makes this more troubling is that the administration has freely released dozens of other strike videos, including footage from the very same day. The president and the Secretary of Defense have posted these videos publicly, almost like a highlight reel. So the question is simple: why hide this one? Officials claim it’s about protecting sources and methods, but that argument falls apart given how many similar videos have already been made public. Critics say the real reason is accountability—that the footage may show a clear violation of international law. The proposed legislation is straightforward: show the full video to Congress, then release a redacted version to the public. If this administration truly believes in transparency, it should have nothing to fear from the truth.

NEWS13 hours ago

HOT UPDATE: The Kennedys Go to War With Trump and He ERUPTS The Kennedy family has officially drawn a line in the sand and they’re not backing down. After Kerry Kennedy vowed to rip Donald Trump’s name off the Kennedy Center “with a pickax,” a political explosion went off across America. Within hours, other prominent Kennedys stood beside her, publicly rejecting Trump, his legacy, and any association with their family’s historic name.

NEWS14 hours ago

🚨⚠️ NO LONGER A RUMOR: Senate Quietly Launches Impeachment Drive — T.R.U.M.P Faces Sanctions in Coming Days 🇺🇸💥

NEWS14 hours ago

🚨JUST IN!!! Melania FLEES As Huge Epstein Lawsuit REVEALED👈

Copyright © 2025 UKwow24