NEWS
🚨 NATIONAL SHOCKWAVE: T.R.U.M.P LEFT REELING as FEDERAL JUDGE MOVES TOWARD CONTEMPT — YEARS OF DEFYING COURT ORDERS COLLIDE WITH A LONG-DELAYED LEGAL RECKONING ⚡
🚨 NATIONAL SHOCKWAVE: T.R.U.M.P LEFT REELING as FEDERAL JUDGE MOVES TOWARD CONTEMPT — YEARS OF DEFYING COURT ORDERS COLLIDE WITH A LONG-DELAYED LEGAL RECKONING ⚡
🚨 NATIONAL SHOCKWAVE: T.R.U.M.P LEFT REELING as FEDERAL JUDGE MOVES TOWARD CONTEMPT — YEARS OF DEFYING COURT ORDERS COLLIDE WITH A LONG-DELAYED LEGAL RECKONING ⚡
Remember when Kristi Noem ran away from a congressional hearing last week?
Now a federal judge isn’t letting her run anymore.
DC Federal Judge James Boasberg has rejected claims of attorney-client privilege and executive privilege, saying:
“I’m not buying it.”
Why?
Because over 130 people were deported to a high-security prison in El Salvador in direct violation of a court order—without hearings, without due process, and with reports of abuse and possible torture.
The judge has ordered live testimony, warning that the crime-fraud exception wipes out any privilege if officials violated the law or defied the courts.
While Noem fled Congress, Judge Boasberg is demanding answers under oath—and contempt findings are now on the table.
This isn’t politics.
This is about whether government officials said “F the courts” and broke the law.
And this judge is not backing down.
when Kristi Noem ran away from a congressional hearing last week?
Now a federal judge isn’t letting her run anymore.
DC Federal Judge James Boasberg has rejected claims of attorney-client privilege and executive privilege, saying:
“I’m not buying it.”
Why?
Because over 130 people were deported to a high-security prison in El Salvador in direct violation of a court order—without hearings, without due process, and with reports of abuse and possible torture.
The judge has ordered live testimony, warning that the crime-fraud exception wipes out any privilege if officials violated the law or defied the courts.
While Noem fled Congress, Judge Boasberg is demanding answers under oath—and contempt findings are now on the table.
This isn’t politics.
This is about whether government officials said “F the courts” and broke the law.
And this judge is not backing down.
