BREAKING: Activists “UNredacted” the files, and already his team is in BIG trouble. There are many Epstein files on the DOJ website where you can highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it onto another document to read the redactions. This is a massive failure for Donald Trump, Pam Bondi, and a Justice Department that wants to look tough but can’t even black out text correctly. They dumped more than 11,000 Epstein documents packed with black bars and thought no one would notice how sloppy it was.

BREAKING: Activists “UNredacted” the files, and already his team is in BIG trouble.

There are many Epstein files on the DOJ website where you can highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it onto another document to read the redactions.

This is a massive failure for Donald Trump, Pam Bondi, and a Justice Department that wants to look tough but can’t even black out text correctly. They dumped more than 11,000 Epstein documents packed with black bars and thought no one would notice how sloppy it was.

Within hours, activists online figured it out. Not elite hackers. Not intelligence agencies. Regular Americans.

Now Trump’s name appears over and over in the files.

And it wasn’t just embarrassing. It was disturbing. One newly unredacted passage described payments tied to Epstein’s inner circle. “Between September 2015 and June 2019, Indyke signed (FAC) for over $400,000 made payable to young female models and actresses,” including “over $380,000 through monthly payments of $8,333.”

Guess who that lawyer works for now? Pete Hegseth.

Another passage alleges efforts to hide “criminal sex trafficking and abuse” and says, “Epstein also instructed one or more Epstein Enterprise participant-witnesses to destroy evidence relevant to ongoing court proceedings.”

Is this bad redaction a result of complete incompetence, or some brave individuals who prefer the truth over protecting Trump and his top goons? Either way, Pam is PANICKING.

The DOJ rushed out a defensive statement, claiming the documents contain “untrue and sensationalist” allegations against Trump. “To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false,” they said, insisting anything credible would have already been “weaponized.”

That’s rich, coming from the same administration that has spent 2025 weaponizing government against Trump’s enemies, while protecting Trump.

Sorry Pam, Kash, Donald… you’re about to find out the price of stupidity.

BREAKING: Activists say they have effectively “UNredacted” files released by the Department of Justice, and the fallout is already causing serious political damage. According to those reviewing the documents, sensitive information was never truly hidden, despite being covered with black bars.

The controversy centers on thousands of pages related to Jeffrey Epstein that were posted on the DOJ website. Activists claim that in many cases, the redactions were so poorly done that users could simply highlight the blacked-out text, copy it, and paste it into another document to reveal what was supposedly concealed.

If accurate, this represents a stunning technical and procedural failure. Redaction is one of the most basic responsibilities of any legal institution, especially when dealing with explosive material tied to criminal investigations and powerful individuals.

Critics are calling this a massive embarrassment for Donald Trump, Pam Bondi, and a Justice Department that frequently presents itself as tough, competent, and in control. Instead, the release is being framed as careless and amateurish, undermining public confidence.

More than 11,000 Epstein-related documents were reportedly dumped online, many filled with thick black bars that appeared, at first glance, to protect identities and sensitive details. Reviewers now argue those bars were little more than visual illusions.

The backlash has been swift, with activists and commentators accusing the DOJ of assuming the public wouldn’t look too closely. In an era of digital literacy and crowdsourced investigation, that assumption is being described as reckless.

What makes the situation worse, critics say, is that the issue wasn’t discovered by insiders or journalists, but by ordinary users experimenting with basic copy-and-paste functions. That detail alone has fueled outrage and ridicule.

Opponents argue this episode exposes a wider problem: a justice system that wants credit for transparency while still trying to control the narrative. When execution fails, the attempt backfires spectacularly.

Supporters of the release may argue that mistakes happen, but detractors insist this was not a minor error. Given the sensitivity of Epstein-related material, even a small redaction failure carries enormous consequences.

As the story continues to spread, pressure is mounting for explanations, accountability, and possibly the removal of the documents altogether. For now, critics say the damage is done—and the DOJ’s credibility has taken a serious hit.