‎HOT UNDATED 🔥🔥🔥: Supreme Court Issues Public Statement Through its Public Information Office Saying Donald Trump’s Military Attack on Venezuela and Arrest of Maduro Was Carried Out Without Congressional Approval, Violating Article I, Section 8 and the War Power Acts of the U.S. Constitution which is Illegal and Impeachable, Orders Swift Investigation ‎ ‎👉 This changes EVERYTHING. Click before it’s buried

SUPREME COURT SIGNALS CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS AFTER TRUMP’S VENEZUELA STRIKE
Public Statement Confirms No Congressional Approval, Declares Action “Illegal and Impeachable,” Orders Swift Investigation
In a move that has sent shockwaves through Washington, the United States Supreme Court, speaking through its Public Information Office, has issued a rare and extraordinary public statement regarding former President Donald Trump’s military attack on Venezuela and the forcible arrest of President Nicolás Maduro.

The statement is blunt.
The implications are enormous.
And the consequences could redefine presidential power forever.
According to the Court, the military operation was carried out without Congressional authorization, in direct violation of Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution and the War Powers Resolution—a breach the Court describes as illegal and potentially impeachable.
Even more stunning: the Court has ordered a swift investigation into how the operation was approved, executed, and concealed.

“NO CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION”
At the heart of the Court’s statement is a single, devastating finding:
Congress was never consulted. Congress never approved. Congress was bypassed.
Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution explicitly grants Congress—not the President—the power to declare war and authorize military force against foreign nations. The War Powers Acts further reinforce this limit, requiring congressional approval for sustained military action.
The Supreme Court’s message is unmistakable:

This was not a gray area. This was not ambiguous. This was not legal.
Legal scholars say the wording of the statement is unusually direct, signaling that the Court sees this not as a policy dispute—but as a constitutional rupture.
WHY THIS STATEMENT IS UNPRECEDENTED
The Supreme Court almost never issues public commentary on ongoing political or military matters. When it does, it chooses its words with surgical precision.

..
That’s why experts are calling this statement one of the most alarming institutional warnings in modern U.S. history.
Rather than waiting for years of litigation, the Court appears to be raising an immediate red flag—alerting Congress and the public that the foundations of constitutional governance may have been breached.
One constitutional law professor put it plainly:

“This reads less like a press release and more like a siren.”
THE “IMPEACHABLE” WORD THAT CHANGED EVERYTHING
Perhaps the most explosive element of the statement is the Court’s explicit reference to impeachability.
The Supreme Court does not impeach presidents.
It does not conduct trials.
It does not vote.
But by declaring the action illegal under the Constitution, the Court has effectively handed Congress the legal basis it needs to act.

Multiple lawmakers are now openly discussing articles of impeachment, arguing that a president who unilaterally launches a military attack—and arrests a foreign head of state—has crossed a line that cannot be ignored.
QUESTIONS THAT NOW DEMAND ANSWERS
The Court’s order for a swift investigation opens the door to a cascade of urgent questions:
Who authorized the strike if Congress did not?
What legal justification, if any, was used internally?
Why was Congress excluded?
What intelligence was presented—or withheld?

And most critically: was the American public deliberately kept in the dark?
Sources on Capitol Hill say subpoenas are already being drafted.
A WARNING ABOUT PRESIDENTIAL POWER
Beyond Trump, beyond Venezuela, beyond this single operation, the Supreme Court’s statement raises a far larger issue:
If a president can unilaterally wage war without Congress, what limits remain?
The Constitution was designed to prevent exactly this scenario—one individual holding the power to drag the nation into conflict without democratic consent.

By stepping forward now, the Court appears to be drawing a hard line:
The presidency is powerful—but it is not absolute.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT
The investigation ordered by the Court is expected to move quickly. Legal analysts say its findings could trigger:
Formal congressional hearings
Release of classified communications
Testimony from Pentagon and White House officials
And potentially, impeachment proceedings
History shows that moments like this do not fade quietly. They escalate.
A MOMENT THAT MAY DEFINE AN ERA
Whether one supports or opposes Donald Trump, this moment transcends politics. It cuts to the core of American constitutional order.

The Supreme Court has spoken.
Congress is now under pressure to act.
And the public is left with a sobering question:
If this is allowed to stand, what comes next?
The story is still unfolding.
And the stakes could not be higher.