🚨JUST IN: 5 Minutes Ago – The most important moment of Jack Smith’s deposition reveals Trump’s involvement in the January 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol. “He was getting calls from people he trusts there, people he relies on to cause the riot, and he still refused to come to the aid of the people at the Capitol. That’s very important evidence of criminal intent in our case, and that is what I’m revealing to you.” JACK SMITH also said: “We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election, prevent the peaceful transfer of power, retain classified documents, and obstruct justice. I would charge an ex-president again, regardless of party.” Watch all eight hours of Jack Smith’s closed-door deposition.👇👇

🚨 BREAKING: Jack Smith Deposition Reveals New Details on Trump’s Actions During January 6 Riot
A newly revealed moment from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s closed-door deposition has reignited national debate over former President Donald Trump’s role in the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

According to Smith, some of the most critical evidence in the ongoing legal battle centers on what Trump allegedly knew—and chose not to do—as the violence unfolded.
In sworn testimony, Smith stated that Trump was receiving real-time calls from individuals he trusted who were present at or directly connected to the events at the Capitol.

“He was getting calls from people he trusts there, people he relies on to cause the riot, and he still refused to come to the aid of the people at the Capitol,” Smith said.
Smith emphasized that this alleged inaction is not a minor detail, but a key piece of evidence prosecutors view as demonstrating criminal intent.
“That’s very important evidence of criminal intent in our case, and that is what I’m revealing to you,” he added.
A Pattern, Not an Isolated Event
Smith’s deposition goes beyond January 6 alone. He argued that the Capitol riot fits into a broader, coordinated effort to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

According to the Special Counsel, investigators gathered evidence they believe proves—beyond a reasonable doubt—that Trump engaged in a criminal scheme with multiple objectives:
Overturning the certified results of the 2020 election
Preventing the peaceful transfer of power
Retaining classified government documents
Obstructing justice through deliberate actions and delays
“We had proof beyond a reasonable doubt,” Smith said, underscoring the confidence of the prosecution’s case.
“I Would Charge an Ex-President Again”
One of the most striking moments from the deposition came when Smith addressed accusations that the prosecution was politically motivated.

“I would charge an ex-president again, regardless of party,” Smith stated.
That declaration appears aimed at countering claims that the investigation targets Trump for political reasons rather than legal ones. Smith framed the case as a matter of accountability, arguing that no individual—past or present—should be above the law.
Why This Deposition Matters
Legal analysts say Smith’s testimony could prove pivotal. While much of the January 6 evidence has been discussed publicly, the deposition highlights how prosecutors interpret Trump’s alleged knowledge, decision-making, and failure to act during the crisis.
If accepted by the courts, this narrative strengthens the argument that Trump’s conduct was not accidental, delayed, or merely negligent—but intentional.

What Comes Next
The full deposition reportedly spans eight hours, containing detailed legal reasoning, evidence summaries, and explanations of prosecutorial strategy. As more excerpts emerge, the testimony is likely to fuel further political fallout, legal challenges, and public debate in an already deeply divided country.

For now, one thing is clear: Jack Smith’s deposition has added fresh intensity to one of the most consequential legal cases involving a former U.S. president in modern history.