NEWS
JACK SMITH HAS UNCOVERED DONALD TRUMP’S SCHEME TO STEAL THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN 8 HOUR TESTIMONY THE TESTIMONY WAS RELEASED BY THE HOUSE JUDICIARY REPUBLICANS IN THE OFF HOURS OF NEW YEARS EVE👉 Read the full testimony details before this disappears — the truth was dropped when they thought no one was watching.
Jack Smith’s 8-Hour Testimony on Trump’s 2020 Election Scheme
Release: House Judiciary Committee on December 31, 2025 – transcript and video made public as millions prepared for New Year’s Eve celebrations. �
Common Dreams
On December 17, 2025, former Justice Department Special Counsel Jack Smith testified in a closed-door deposition before the U.S. House Judiciary Committee. The 255-page transcript and 8-hour video were released publicly just before midnight on December 31 in what many commentators described as an “off-hours” dump by House Republicans. �
House Judiciary Committee Republicans +1
Who Is Jack Smith
Jack Smith was appointed as a special counsel by the U.S. Attorney General to lead two federal criminal prosecutions of former President Donald Trump — one involving classified materials at Mar-a-Lago, and the other charging Trump with a criminal conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election and obstruct the constitutional transfer of power after losing to Joe Biden. �
The Independent
Key Claims in the Testimony
1. Trump Engaged in a “Criminal Scheme” to Overturn the 2020 Election
Smith testified that his investigation “developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt” that Donald Trump engaged in a criminal conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Smith said team members built their case on testimony and evidence that showed Trump’s actions went beyond protected speech and into criminal conduct aimed at stopping the lawful certification of the election. �
The Guardian +1
Smith argued that Trump’s persistent false claims of widespread fraud weren’t protected by the First Amendment when they were used specifically to disrupt the legal counting and certification of votes for the purpose of staying in office. �
Common Dreams
2. Trump Privately Acknowledged He Lost the 2020 Election
According to the testimony’s transcript, Smith told lawmakers that Trump had privately acknowledged losing to Joe Biden in 2020, including remarks like, “Can you believe I lost to this f’ing guy?” — even as he publicly continued to press false fraud claims. �
Reuters
Evidence and Notable Points from the Testimony
False Claims and Constitutional Limits
Smith insisted that while a person may make false claims, trumpeting intentionally false statements to disrupt a lawful government function crosses legal boundaries — particularly when done to influence or impede the certification of an election. �
Common Dreams
He stated, “There is no historical analog for what President Trump did in this case,” emphasizing the unprecedented nature of the allegations. �
Common Dreams
January 6 Capitol Riot Connection
Smith told the committee that the January 6 Capitol attack “does not happen” without Trump’s actions, highlighting that Trump’s conduct in spreading false election fraud claims and encouraging supporters was a proximate cause of the violence. �
AP News
Subpoenaing Phone Records
During the deposition, Smith defended the investigative step of subpoenaing phone records of lawmakers and aides, saying that this was done only because Trump directed his allies in ways that made such records relevant to the case. He stated responsibility for that evidence collection “lies with Donald Trump”. �
Common Dreams
Gag Orders Requested
Smith said he and his team sought gag orders against Trump because Trump’s public statements were putting witnesses, court staff, and others at risk through intimidation and threats tied to the prosecutions. �
Common Dreams
Political Context of the Testimony’s Release
Why the Timing Matters
The deposition and its recorded testimony were delivered in a closed session, but the House Judiciary Committee released them publicly late on New Year’s Eve, when national attention was low — prompting criticism that Republicans were trying to “bury” the release rather than promote debate around its contents. �
Common Dreams
Republican leaders had previously contested the legitimacy of Smith’s cases and characterized the DOJ under President Biden as over-zealous or politically motivated. In response, Smith repeatedly told lawmakers there was no political influence behind the decisions to bring charges — and that this was about evidence and law enforcement. �
Facebook
What Happened to the Criminal Cases
Although Smith’s team brought federal indictments, both the election interference case and Trump’s classified documents case were dropped after Trump won the 2024 election, due to Department of Justice policy that ordinarily prevents charging a sitting president. �
Reuters
Implications and Reactions
Legal experts and commentators are debating the testimony and what it reveals:
Some civil rights and legal scholars say the public release provides rare insight into a major federal criminal investigation and how prosecutors viewed the evidence. �
Common Dreams
Others question the political motivations behind releasing it during a holiday-week news lull.
Supporters of Smith argue the deposition shows a strong evidentiary basis for believing Trump committed actionable offenses; critics argue the case was politically driven. The full public reaction is still unfolding.
🔥 IMPEACHABLE: Trump Secretly Bombed Venezuela for Months — Congress Never Approved ItA legal bombshell is exploding in Washington — and it changes everything. A U.S. legal expert is now laying out why Donald Trump’s military action against Venezuela isn’t just reckless foreign policy, but a clear violation of U.S. law. And one buried fact completely destroys the administration’s defense: The bombing didn’t start recently. It started months ago — in September. That single detail detonates Trump’s legal argument. Here’s why it matters. Under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, the law is crystal clear: If a president sends U.S. forces into hostilities without a formal declaration of war or explicit approval from Congress, the clock starts ticking. The president has 60 days. No approval? The military action must stop. No loopholes. No resets. No excuses. Public reporting confirms that U.S. forces began bombing Venezuelan-linked boats as far back as September, using American military force in the Caribbean. That legally qualifies as hostilities. Congress never declared war. Congress never authorized the strikes. And Congress was never asked to approve them within the 60-day deadline. Which means the legal clock started in September. And it expired months ago. “That’s the part people are missing,” said attorney Joe Gallina, who has training in international and cross-border criminal law. “Once U.S. bombs were used in September, the War Powers Resolution was triggered. Everything after that runs on the same clock — and that clock is long dead.” This is not a gray area. This is not a policy debate. Legal scholars are now saying the quiet part out loud: continuing military operations after the War Powers deadline — without congressional authorization — is unlawful and impeachable. The law was written after Vietnam to stop presidents from doing exactly this.
🚨 30 MINUTES AGO: Congress just LAUNCHED IMPEACHMENT 3.0 after reports Trump attacked Venezuela overnight and forcibly seized President Maduro and his wife, bringing them to the U.S. in what lawmakers are calling an illegal act of war. Now it’s exploding further: Sources say the ICC in The Hague is moving toward a TRUMP ARREST WARRANT, whistleblowers claim the strike was personal revenge, and warn another country could be next. And tonight? Trump is reportedly preparing a midnight Truth Social rant, vowing “TOTAL WAR” — even inside the United States. 👉 What he’s demanding in exchange for Maduro’s release is even more shocking. Click now before this disappears.
🚨 BREAKING: Trump Claims U.S. Forces Captured Venezuela’s President Overnight Americans woke up to a jaw-dropping claim: Donald Trump says U.S. forces bombed Venezuela and captured Nicolás Maduro, removing him from power. And this wasn’t a leaked tip or anonymous rumor—Trump himself announced it. If true, this could be one of the most extreme and reckless uses of U.S. military power in modern history. No war declaration. No congressional approval. No imminent threat. Just a direct strike against a sovereign nation. That is not how the Constitution works. Over a month ago, Senator Chris Murphy warned that U.S. military action in Venezuela would be “wildly illegal”—and now his warning looks chillingly prescient. This isn’t about protecting Americans or defending democracy. This is about political desperation—using foreign crises to distract from scandals at home. History shows us the result: instability, escalation, and innocent lives paying the price.🔥 This story could vanish fast. Don’t miss the full details, legal chaos, and the shocking questions Trump isn’t answering. 👉 Read the full blog post now before it disappears
💥BREAKING: Tension is surging on Capitol Hill tonight as reports emerge that panic is spreading among members of Congress, with multiple lawmakers allegedly retreating behind closed doors in an urgent effort to scrub their digital footprints!!!
🚨 THE TRUTH CAN’T BE BURIED ANYMORE: 1,200 EPSTEIN VICTIMS BREAK THEIR SILENCE—A DOJ DENIAL UNRAVELS AS T.R.U.M.P MAKES BIG MOVES TO CONTAIN THE FALLOUT
BREAKING: Liz Cheney has ignited a national firestorm after making explosive claims about an alleged diagnosis involving Donald Trump, reportedly linked to a White House doctor. Cheney said the reported findings raise serious concerns, describing Trump as unfit, unstable, and dangerous—remarks that immediately sparked intense nationwide debate. She went even further, hinting at revelations that some say could be politically devastating not only for Trump, but also for Barack Obama and the doctor involved. #BreakingNews #LizCheney #DonaldTrump #PoliticalStorm #WhiteHouse #USPolitics🔥 Washington insiders are panicking—and the public hasn’t seen the full picture yet. Don’t wait for the spin. Tap the link and see the raw details.
🚨 TRUMP CAPTURES MADURO AFTER BOMBING VENEZUELA – SENATOR: “IT’S WILDLY ILLEGAL.” Americans woke up today to an extraordinary claim from the President of the United States: Donald Trump says U.S. forces bombed Venezuela overnight and captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, removing him from the country. This was not leaked reporting. It was not anonymous sourcing. It was Trump himself announcing it. And If true it represents one of the most extreme and reckless uses of U.S. military power in modern history. There has been no declaration of war. There has been no authorization from Congress. There has been no public explanation of an imminent threat to the United States. Yet Trump claims to have carried out a direct military strike against a sovereign nation and seized its head of state. That is not how the Constitution works. More than a month ago, on November 16, 2025, U.S. Senator Chris Murphy warned exactly where this road leads. When asked about possible U.S. military action against Venezuela, Murphy said it would be “wildly illegal,” calling it a transparent effort to distract the public from rising prices and mounting scandals at home. That warning now looks chillingly prescient. This is not about defending democracy. This is not about protecting Americans. This is not about international law. This is about a president who believes he can use military force to change the subject whenever accountability closes in. History is very clear about moments like this. When leaders face political pressure at home and manufacture foreign crises abroad, the result is instability, escalation, and innocent people paying the price for political desperation. If Trump believes he has the authority to bomb another country and capture its president, he must present that authority publicly and legally. He must answer to Congress. He must answer to the Constitution. And he must answer to the American people. If he cannot do that, then this is not strength. It is lawlessness. And it is exactly what Americans were warned about.👉 Read the full breakdown, the legal implications, and what happens next — before this story disappears from your feed. Click now.
JUST IN: Former Special Counsel Jack Smith has revealed how a sweeping injunction issued by Judge Aileen Cannon blocked him from sharing explosive evidence with Congress—evidence he says shows Donald Trump knowingly retained hundreds of presidential and highly classified documents. According to Smith, the records were stored in bathrooms and ballrooms at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club, even after subpoenas were issued. He alleges Trump deliberately defied those subpoenas, obstructed law enforcement, concealed evidence, and repeatedly lied about continuing to possess the classified materials. But Smith didn’t stop there. He went further, describing what he called overwhelming evidence tied not only to the documents themselves, but to how they were hidden and moved within Mar-a-Lago’s ballroom spaces. Washington is now in turmoil following the revelations. Lawmakers, legal experts, and the public are demanding answers—and the questions surrounding Trump’s conduct are growing louder by the hour….👉 Click now — the evidence Congress never saw is finally coming to light.
40 minutes ago: BREAKING — Reports say panic is spreading across Congress as multiple members meet behind closed doors, urgently trying to wipe digital footprints. The scramble follows claims that J@ck Sm!th uploaded subpoenaed phone records tied to calls from D0n@ld Tr@mp during efforts to delay the 2020 certification. Sources warn the records may reveal coordinated actions at the highest levels. As the files circulate, W@sh!ngt0n is on edge—and pressure is rapidly escalated👉 Read the full testimony details before this disappears — the truth was dropped when they thought no one was watching.
JACK SMITH HAS UNCOVERED DONALD TRUMP’S SCHEME TO STEAL THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN 8 HOUR TESTIMONY THE TESTIMONY WAS RELEASED BY THE HOUSE JUDICIARY REPUBLICANS IN THE OFF HOURS OF NEW YEARS EVE👉 Read the full testimony details before this disappears — the truth was dropped when they thought no one was watching.
Ladies and Gentlemen. Everyone is Talking about Jack Smith Testimony in Front of the House Judicial Committee. Jack Smith couldn’t discuss the Best Part of the Grand Jury Testimony, because it’s under Federal Seal. Treason is going to be Revealed 27 Feb 2026, Allegedly Trump sold Nuclear Secrets, on 3 Different Occasions, he’s has the Phone Records, Wire Transfer this is going to be very Interesting.👉 What’s under federal seal could change everything. Click now before this disappears.
