JACK SMITH HAS UNCOVERED DONALD TRUMP’S SCHEME TO STEAL THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN 8 HOUR TESTIMONY ‎ ‎THE TESTIMONY WAS RELEASED BY THE HOUSE JUDICIARY REPUBLICANS IN THE OFF HOURS OF NEW YEARS EVE👉 Read the full testimony details before this disappears — the truth was dropped when they thought no one was watching.

Jack Smith’s 8-Hour Testimony on Trump’s 2020 Election Scheme
Release: House Judiciary Committee on December 31, 2025 – transcript and video made public as millions prepared for New Year’s Eve celebrations. �
Common Dreams

On December 17, 2025, former Justice Department Special Counsel Jack Smith testified in a closed-door deposition before the U.S. House Judiciary Committee. The 255-page transcript and 8-hour video were released publicly just before midnight on December 31 in what many commentators described as an “off-hours” dump by House Republicans. �
House Judiciary Committee Republicans +1
Who Is Jack Smith

Jack Smith was appointed as a special counsel by the U.S. Attorney General to lead two federal criminal prosecutions of former President Donald Trump — one involving classified materials at Mar-a-Lago, and the other charging Trump with a criminal conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election and obstruct the constitutional transfer of power after losing to Joe Biden. �
The Independent
Key Claims in the Testimony
1. Trump Engaged in a “Criminal Scheme” to Overturn the 2020 Election
Smith testified that his investigation “developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt” that Donald Trump engaged in a criminal conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Smith said team members built their case on testimony and evidence that showed Trump’s actions went beyond protected speech and into criminal conduct aimed at stopping the lawful certification of the election. �

The Guardian +1
Smith argued that Trump’s persistent false claims of widespread fraud weren’t protected by the First Amendment when they were used specifically to disrupt the legal counting and certification of votes for the purpose of staying in office. �
Common Dreams
2. Trump Privately Acknowledged He Lost the 2020 Election
According to the testimony’s transcript, Smith told lawmakers that Trump had privately acknowledged losing to Joe Biden in 2020, including remarks like, “Can you believe I lost to this f’ing guy?” — even as he publicly continued to press false fraud claims. �
Reuters
Evidence and Notable Points from the Testimony
False Claims and Constitutional Limits
Smith insisted that while a person may make false claims, trumpeting intentionally false statements to disrupt a lawful government function crosses legal boundaries — particularly when done to influence or impede the certification of an election. �
Common Dreams

He stated, “There is no historical analog for what President Trump did in this case,” emphasizing the unprecedented nature of the allegations. �
Common Dreams
January 6 Capitol Riot Connection
Smith told the committee that the January 6 Capitol attack “does not happen” without Trump’s actions, highlighting that Trump’s conduct in spreading false election fraud claims and encouraging supporters was a proximate cause of the violence. �
AP News

Subpoenaing Phone Records
During the deposition, Smith defended the investigative step of subpoenaing phone records of lawmakers and aides, saying that this was done only because Trump directed his allies in ways that made such records relevant to the case. He stated responsibility for that evidence collection “lies with Donald Trump”. �
Common Dreams
Gag Orders Requested
Smith said he and his team sought gag orders against Trump because Trump’s public statements were putting witnesses, court staff, and others at risk through intimidation and threats tied to the prosecutions. �
Common Dreams

Political Context of the Testimony’s Release
Why the Timing Matters
The deposition and its recorded testimony were delivered in a closed session, but the House Judiciary Committee released them publicly late on New Year’s Eve, when national attention was low — prompting criticism that Republicans were trying to “bury” the release rather than promote debate around its contents. �
Common Dreams

Republican leaders had previously contested the legitimacy of Smith’s cases and characterized the DOJ under President Biden as over-zealous or politically motivated. In response, Smith repeatedly told lawmakers there was no political influence behind the decisions to bring charges — and that this was about evidence and law enforcement. �
Facebook
What Happened to the Criminal Cases
Although Smith’s team brought federal indictments, both the election interference case and Trump’s classified documents case were dropped after Trump won the 2024 election, due to Department of Justice policy that ordinarily prevents charging a sitting president. �
Reuters

Implications and Reactions
Legal experts and commentators are debating the testimony and what it reveals:
Some civil rights and legal scholars say the public release provides rare insight into a major federal criminal investigation and how prosecutors viewed the evidence. �

Common Dreams
Others question the political motivations behind releasing it during a holiday-week news lull.
Supporters of Smith argue the deposition shows a strong evidentiary basis for believing Trump committed actionable offenses; critics argue the case was politically driven. The full public reaction is still unfolding.